irene
New Member
Posts: 5
|
Post by irene on Oct 3, 2013 12:32:00 GMT
Dear all,
a conceptual issue: Is there a difference between estimating heritability by using GCTA and estimating variance explained by common SNPs?
I am asking because I am interested to know if I should use the filter of close relatedness (>0.025) or not? If I don't exclude those relatives (closer than 3rd cousins), will I have a problem estimating the narrow sense heritability in my sample? Or is this filter should be used only in the case I want to estimate proportion of variance explained by common SNPs?
Any idea/ suggestion is more than welcome!
|
|
|
Post by douchi on Oct 7, 2013 14:21:31 GMT
Hello Irene,
I think there is any difference. You should use the filter to minimize the noise in the estimation procedure.
Dan
|
|
|
Post by Jian Yang on Oct 7, 2013 14:41:34 GMT
Yes, there is a difference. Please see FAQ #5. www.complextraitgenomics.com/software/gcta/FAQ.html In brief, GCTA estimate using family data including close relatives is similar to (not exact the same) the heritability estimated from traditional family and twin studies, whereas the estimate using unrelated samples is an estimate of variance explained by SNPs rather than the trait heritability.
|
|